The hundred and sixth response;
Matt Hogan said…Who the hell are you, Yuval L? That was bigotry at it’s most obvious. You must be a fan of Donald Trump! There is no cure, there never will be a cure and we don’t want a cure! My nephew and son have lives, and so does every other Autistic I know, except for Oliver of course! Screw you, whoever you are!
November 29, 2015 at 8:59 PM
Oliver Canby said…Yuval actually is a proud supporter of Donald Trump.
November 29, 2015 at 11:48 PM
The hundred and seventh response;
Anonymous said…Okay, jackass, what’s happening right now in San Bernadino is what would happen if you got your stupid fucking Amendment through! It was an attack on neurodiversity (which no doubt you’d approve of!) and lethal injection is NO FUCKING DIFFERENT TO GUNS!! Take this entry down, you inciter!
December 2, 2015 at 1:30 PM
Oliver Canby said…Do you know something that I don’t? There’s no evidence at all that “neurodiversity” was the target of the San Bernardino shooting, and you saying that I incited it is libel. Although I would prefer firing squad as a method of execution, the Supreme Court has held that it violates the 8th Amendment, so lethal injection will have to do.
December 2, 2015 at 4:10 PM
The hundred and eighth response;
Oliver Canby said…No, it doesn’t. The Supreme Court has held multiple times that the death penalty is constitutional, which is why it is still legal.
December 3, 2015 at 12:09 AM
The hundred and ninth response;
Anonymous said…The 8th Amendment prevents cruel and unusual punishment! Lethal injection for neurodiversity is cruel and unusual punishment! Therefore it violates the 8th Amendment!!
December 3, 2015 at 4:56 PM
Oliver Canby said…That is why the Constitution must be amended to allow it, and I have proposed such an amendment to fix that.
December 3, 2015 at 8:55 PM
The hundred and tenth responses;
Anonymous said…It won’t. The Supreme Court will strike it down.
December 4, 2015 at 12:48 PM
Syncompac said…NO IT MUST NOT!! You’re the arsehole who has to be fucking amended!
December 4, 2015 at 4:38 PM
Oliver Canby said…Anon: You’re wrong, and you’re incredibly stupid. I feel bad for how dumb you are. A constitutional amendment cannot possibly be found unconstitutional because it is an AMENDMENT. It literally changes what is constitutional and what is unconstitutional. Under your perverse logic, the 14th Amendment is unconstitutional because it violates the three-fifths compromise clause. Honestly, you need to grow a brain.
Troy Mullane: I am going to come to your house and kill you. You are going to die, motherfucker! You are a disgusting Abo who has no place on this earth, and your existence is in clear violation of the White Australia policy.
December 4, 2015 at 5:18 PM
The hundred and eleventh responses;
Scratcher said…LMAO! The White Australia Policy was abolished in 1973, you flaming dip!! And Sync is not Troy Mullane by the way so you threatened death on the wrong bloke!
December 4, 2015 at 7:41 PM
Anonymous said…Stop talking legal stuff, jackass. You’re making a fool of yourself.
December 4, 2015 at 8:17 PM
Oliver Canby said…Anon: Quite the contrary. The pot is calling the kettle black. You are the one making a fool of yourself, and you likely aren’t even from this country. The word amendment means change, so yes, it literally changes the Constitution. It is not simply a new law. The Supreme Court cannot find a constitutional amendment to be unconstitutional.
Scratcher: Syncompac is in fact Troy Mullane. The Informer says so. Therefore, it must be true.
December 4, 2015 at 10:25 PM
The hundred and twelfth response;
The Informer said…Of course it’s true. And you can’t change that, Scratch-it-up!
December 5, 2015 at 1:44 AM
Oliver Canby said…You go, Informer!
December 5, 2015 at 10:31 AM
The hundred and thirteenth response;
Anonymous said…The 14th Amendment has nothing to do with the 3/5 compromise, dickhead! IF (and that’s a big IF) your Amendment gets up we will take it to the Supreme Court and it will be struck out! GUARAN-FUCKING-TEED!!
December 5, 2015 at 5:09 PM
Oliver Canby said…You’re an idiot. First of all, nothing can be “struck out” in the United States. That’s a British term. Only a baseball player can be struck out. What you mean to say is overturned, but that is not possible as I have said before. The 14th Amendment is specifically what overturned the three-fifths compromise. It gave black peoples full citizenship, whereas they had previously only counted as three fifths of a person in the census. The Supreme Court has no power to overturn a constitutional amendment. If my proposed amendment is ratified, it shall become law and there’s nothing you can do about it. The only way an amendment can be repealed is via another constitutional amendment, as the 18th Amendment was via the 21st Amendment. You are just so stupid, dude. Get help. Seriously.
December 5, 2015 at 8:10 PM
The hundred and fourteenth response;
Anonymous said…You’re an idiot! “Struck out” is a general legal term, not just British! “Overturn” only applies to decisions in a court. Anything outside a court that goes in is an application, and they can be “struck out”! You’re not a fucking lawyer, cunt, so shut up about it! There won’t be any 28th Amendment from you anyway. It’s a figment of your imagination. You are just so stupid, dude. Get help. Seriously.
December 8, 2015 at 1:00 PM
Oliver Canby said…Not true. Nobody in the US says “struck out” unless they’re talking about baseball. Maybe “struck down,” but never “struck out.” Overturn can refer to a lower court’s decision, or to a piece of legislation being found unconstitutional. Both my parents are lawyers and I have sufficient legal knowledge from them. You do NOT call me a cunt. That is intolerable. For that, I am going to kill you. I have already purchased an AK-47 and I am going to use it to end your life.
December 8, 2015 at 6:16 PM
The hundred and fifteenth response;
Anonymous said…I have a Heckler & Koch MP7, and a license for it. Come and get me, cunt-who-has-no-parents-in-courts.
December 8, 2015 at 11:12 PM
Oliver Canby said…You can Google both of them. They are members of the California state bar.
December 8, 2015 at 11:33 PM
The hundred and sixteenth response;
Anonymous said…Googled. You lied. No active females. One active male in Beverly Hills? That is WAY out of your league!
December 8, 2015 at 11:53 PM
Oliver Canby said…Yes, my father does practice in Beverly Hills. My mother has a different surname than I do.
December 9, 2015 at 12:17 AM
The hundred and seventeenth response;
Anonymous said…Bullshit. On both counts. The real world is that way. Go to it.
December 9, 2015 at 12:20 AM
Oliver Canby said…You have no fucking clue what you’re talking about, asshole. Everything I have said is the God’s honest truth, and you do not own a gun. After the Elliot Rodger shooting, the California state legislature passed a law making it illegal for anyone with autism or Asperger’s to purchase a firearm, and the bill was signed by Governor Jerry Brown in September of last year. You need to be institutionalized for the sake of society. Go suck a dick, faggot.
December 9, 2015 at 12:52 AM
The hundred and eighteenth response;
Anonymous said…You wouldn’t know the truth if it boxed your ears in. YOU need to be institutionalized for the sake of society. Here’s a truth – the law that Brown signed was to prohibit concealed weapons in schools! I own a gun. Come and find out! And bring your COMMIE weapon with you!
December 9, 2015 at 1:04 AM
Oliver Canby said…Gov. Brown signed the concealed weapon bill long before the Elliot Rodger shooting. Completely different law. You have admitted to owning a gun, which is a crime here in California. I will be reporting you to the California Department of Game and Fish, and they will arrest you for illegal weapons possession. Have fun getting assraped in prison, fuckwit.
December 9, 2015 at 1:50 AM
The hundred and nineteenth response;
Anonymous said…You’re the one going to jail!
December 9, 2015 at 9:01 PM
Oliver Canby said…Nope. I have never committed a crime in my life.
December 9, 2015 at 10:55 PM
The hundred and twentieth response;
Anonymous said…Yes you have! Four death threats! That’s a fucking crime! So is owning an AK-47!
December 10, 2015 at 2:25 AM
Oliver Canby said…Nope. Owning a gun is protected under the 2nd Amendment, and free speech (including death threats) are protected under the 1st Amendment.
December 10, 2015 at 12:11 PM
That concludes Part 8.